LB
LIFETIME BRANDS, INC (LCUT)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 net sales were $171.9M (-6.5% YoY) and GAAP diluted EPS was $(0.05); adjusted EPS was $0.11. Gross margin was 35.1% (down 160 bps YoY) as pricing actions preserved margin dollars but lowered margin percentage .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue missed ($176.0M* vs $171.9M) and EPS normalized missed ($0.14* vs $0.11); both small shortfalls as tariffs and order timing weighed on the top line (S&P Global) .
- Management highlighted tariff volatility, pricing actions that “approximately offset” tariff cost increases, and a shift of orders from Q3 to Q4 at two of the three largest customers; they reiterated no formal financial guidance given uncertainty .
- Cost control and Project Concord remained supportive: SG&A declined 8.5% YoY to $35.5M; TTM adjusted EBITDA was $47.2M with liquidity of ~$50.9M at quarter-end; the Board declared a $0.0425 dividend payable Feb 13, 2026 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- International achieved growth: sales +1.5% YoY to $13.8M; International gross margin improved to 35.5% on favorable mix .
- Cost discipline and efficiency: SG&A fell 8.5% YoY to $35.5M; U.S. distribution expense as a % of goods shipped improved to 8.5% (ex non-recurring) from 10.1% on labor efficiencies .
- Product momentum: management cited strong performance in Dolly, Build‑A‑Board, and S’well glass hydration; cutlery and kitchen measurement continued to gain share .
Quote (CEO): “Our tariff mitigation strategy is now fully in place… The Dolly line and the expanded Build‑A‑Board collection have performed well… [and] our new glass bottle line under the S’well brand has launched successfully.”
What Went Wrong
- Top line pressure: consolidated net sales declined 6.5% YoY to $171.9M; U.S. segment fell 7.1% to $158.1M, with Tableware down 22.7% and Home Solutions down 12.8% on retailer order shifts and softer demand .
- Margin dilution: gross margin rate fell to 35.1% (from 36.7%) as pricing actions preserved gross profit dollars but lowered the percentage mix .
- Elevated tax rate: the effective tax rate was 171.1% in Q3, influenced by non‑deductible expenses and a partial valuation allowance, contributing to a GAAP net loss .
Financial Results
Headline summary and trends
Q3 2025 vs Consensus (S&P Global)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment performance (Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024)
KPIs and balance sheet highlights
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic positioning: “Our tariff mitigation strategy is now fully in place… [and] the diverse geographic footprint… is firmly in place, and we are positioned to adjust our sourcing across regions” .
- Demand outlook and order timing: “We expect that shipments to two of our three largest customers will rebound in the fourth quarter due to a shift of orders from the third quarter to the fourth quarter” .
- Pricing and gross margin dollars: “Our pricing actions were designed to maintain gross margin dollars, which arithmetically results in a lower gross margin percentage” .
- Balance sheet and profitability quality: “Liqudity remains solid at $51 million, and adjusted EBITDA for the trailing 12 months… was $47.2 million” .
- M&A environment: “We are actively engaged… we’re seeing a meaningful reduction in valuation… [and] good valuations… with meaningful synergies and cost eliminations” .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing vs volume and tariff pass-through: CFO: “our price increase approximately offsets the additional tariffs… still being phased in… additional impact in the fourth quarter” .
- Sourcing mix and China: CEO detailed flexibility to shift between Southeast Asia and China due to logistics constraints, with economics currently favorable “all in” including tariffs; can flex up to ~80% out of China when conditions warrant .
- Order timing/holiday: Management expects Q4 rebound for two of three largest customers due to Q3→Q4 order shift; still cautious on holiday sell-through .
- M&A valuations: With financial buyers on the sidelines, management is seeing reduced multiples and synergy-driven opportunities .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 revenue and EPS normalized missed S&P Global consensus: Revenue $176.0M* vs $171.9M actual; EPS normalized $0.14* vs $0.11 actual. Shortfalls reflect tariff-induced choppiness and retailer order timing .
- Street models may adjust revenue phasing (more Q4/2026 from delayed shipments) and assume lower gross margin percentage as price actions prioritize gross profit dollars over rate, while factoring ongoing cost discipline and Concord benefits .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Tariff shock absorption is working: price increases are largely offsetting tariff costs, albeit with temporary volume/order timing impacts and a lower gross margin percentage .
- Order phasing sets up Q4: management expects Q4 shipment rebounds at key accounts; monitor holiday sell‑through and Q4 mix for confirmation .
- International and Concord are tailwinds: International delivered growth and margin improvement; restructuring largely executed with further benefits expected into 2026 .
- Cost control supports earnings quality: SG&A down 8.5% YoY; U.S. distribution efficiency improved; focus on preserving gross margin dollars .
- Balance sheet manageable: ~$50.9M liquidity and $47.2M TTM adjusted EBITDA provide flexibility during tariff/macro volatility .
- Watch sourcing agility: company can flex production across China/SE Asia/Mexico; current conditions prompted some shifts back to China but footprint diversification intact .
- Potential catalysts: M&A opportunity set improving with lower valuations and synergy potential; dividend maintained at $0.0425 quarterly .